ISHS
  eJHS
     
EJHS
Home


Submit
an article


Subscriptions

ISHS Home

ISHS Contact

Search

eJHS
  Eur.J.Hortic.Sci. 86 (2) 122-129 | DOI: 10.17660/eJHS.2021/86.2.2
ISSN 1611-4426 print and 1611-4434 online | © ISHS 2021 | European Journal of Horticultural Science | Original article

Dynamic changes of DNA methyltransferase and demethylase gene expression during Chrysanthemummorifolium flower induction and development

Kang Dongru, Li Zhongai, Li Mangmang, Li Jie, Liu Yanhua, Ai Penghui, Ding Hongxu, Zhu Yi, Wang Ying and Wang Zicheng
Plant Germplasm Resources and Genetic Laboratory, Kaifeng Key Laboratory of Chrysanthemum Biology, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China

SUMMARY
DNA methylation plays an important role in plant growth and development. The purpose of this study was to observe the expression of DNA methylation related genes in Chrysanthemummorifolium. Homologous genes related to DNA methylation in chrysanthemum were cloned, and obtained 1,509-bp for CmCMT, 1,470-bp for CmDRM and 608-bp for CmDME. The C. morifolium cultivar ‘Nannonghongxiu’ was exposed to short-day (SD) conditions, and the expression of DNA methyltransferase and demethylase genes in flowering plants was analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. At flowering stage, CmFT expression level exhibited an increasing trend while CmMET1 and CmCMT3 showed a decreasing trend; the intensity of decrease was greater in SD-treated plants compared to control plants in the same stage. The expression of CmDRM2 was up-regulated in the flowering stage. The expression level of CmDRM2 was lower in control plants as compared to SD-treated plants in the first three growth stages. However, the CmDRM2 expression level in the control plants was at peak during full bloom stage as well as higher than SD-treated plants. The highest CmDME expression level was observed during full bloom stage in both types, however, control plants showed higher level in comparison with the plants exposed to SD conditions. The expression levels of the DNA methyltransferase and demethylase genes undergo dynamic changes during the transition from vegetative growth to reproductive growth (flowering induction stage) and flower development, which seems to influence DNA methylation changes in the leaves.

Keywords Chrysanthemummorifolium, gene clone, DNA methylation, vegetative growth, reproductive growth

Significance of this study

What is already known on this subject?

  • It is well known that DNA methylation plays an important role in the growth and development of plants, but the specific mechanism in the induction of flowering in Chrysanthemums is still unclear.
What are the new findings?
  • The expression level of the DNA methyltransferase and demethylase genes undergo dynamic changes during the transition from vegetative growth to reproductive growth.
What is the expected impact on horticulture?
  • The study on the expression of DNA methylation-related genes not only provides genetic resources for the subsequent regulation of flowering period in Chrysanthemums, but also provides a basis for the subsequent studies on related mechanisms.

Download fulltext version How to cite this article       Export citation to RIS format      

E-mail: wzc@henu.edu.cn  

References

  • Amasino, R. (2010). Seasonal and developmental timing of flowering. Plant J. 61(6), 1001–1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2010.04148.x.

  • Bratzel, F., and Turck, F. (2015). Molecular memories in the regulation of seasonal flowering: From competence to cessation. Genome Biol. 16(1), 192. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0770-6.

  • Chan, S.W., Henderson, I.R., and Jacobsen, S.E. (2005). Gardening the genome: DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6(5), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1601.

  • Chang, L.L., Zhang, Z.H., Han, B.M., et al. (2009). Isolation of DNA-methyltransferase genes from strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duch.) and their expression in relation to micropropagation. Plant Cell Rep. 28(9), 1373–1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-009-0737-8.

  • Chinnusamy, V., and Zhu, J.K. (2009). RNA-directed DNA methylation and demethylation in plants. Sci. China 52(4), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-009-0052-1.

  • Davis, S.J. (2002). Photoperiodism: The coincidental perception of the season. Current Biol. 12(24), R841–R843. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01348-9.

  • Deleris, A., Greenberg, M.V.C., Ausin, I., et al. (2010). Involvement of a Jumonji‐C domain‐containing histone demethylase in DRM2‐mediated maintenance of DNA methylation. EMBO Reports 11(12), 950–955. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2010.158.

  • Goll, M.G., and Bestor, T.H. (2005). Eukaryotic cytosine methyltransferases. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 74, 481–514. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.010904.153721.

  • Hauser, M.-T., Aufsatz, W., Jonak, C., and Luschnig, C. (2011). Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in plant. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1809, 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.03.007.

  • Kang, D.R., Dai, S.L., Gao, K., Zhang, F., and Luo, H. (2019a). Morphological variation of five cut Chrysanthemum cultivars induced by 5-azacytidine treatment. Hortscience 54(7), 1208–1216. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14012-18.

  • Kang, D.R., Dai, S.L., Gao, K., Zhang, F., and Luo, H. (2019b). Morphological variation of Chrysanthemum lavandulifolium induced by 5-azaC treatment. Sci. Hortic. 257, 108645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108645.

  • Kondo, H., Miura, T., Wada, K.C., et al. (2007). Induction of flowering by 5-azaC in some plant species: Relationship between the stability of photoperiodically induced flowering and flower-inducing effect of DNA demethylation. Physiol. Plant. 131(3), 462–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00965.x.

  • Law, J.A., and Jacobsen, S.E. (2010). Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nature Rev. Gen. 11(3), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2719.

  • Le, T.N., Schumann, U., Smith, N.A., et al. (2014). DNA demethylases target promoter transposable elements to positively regulate stress responsive genes in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol. 15(9), 458. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0458-3.

  • Li, S.L., Li, M.M., Li, Z.A., et al. (2019). Effects of the silencing of CmMET1 by RNA interference in chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium). Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 13(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-019-00516-5.

  • Li, Z.A., Li, J., Liu, Y.H., et al. (2016). DNA demethylation during Chrysanthemum floral transition following short-day treatment. Electr. J. Biotechnol. 21, 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2016.02.006.

  • Li, Z.A., Li, J., Zhu, Q.Q., Liu, Y.H., and Wang, Z.C. (2017). Effect of external 5-azaC on physiology and DNA methylation and gene-expression of Chrysanthemum. J. Henan Univ., Nat. Sci. 47(2), 162–169 (in Chinese with English abstract).

  • Lindroth, A.M., Cao, X., Jackson, J.P., Zilberman, D., McCallum, C.M., Henikoff, S., et al. (2001). Requirement of CHROMOMETHYLASE3 for maintenance of CpXpG methylation. Science 292(5524), 2077. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059745.

  • Okello, R.C.O., De Visser, P.H.B., Heuvelink, E., et al. (2016). Light mediated regulation of cell division, endoreduplication and cell expansion. Environm. Experim. Bot. 121, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.04.003.

  • Paszkowski, J., and Grossniklaus, U. (2011). Selected aspects of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance and resetting in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14(2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2011.01.002.

  • Qi, L.J., Yuan, Y., Wu, C., et al. (2015). Bioinformatics analysis of DNA demethylase genes in Lonicera japonica Thunb. Acta Pharm. Sinica 50(3), 367–371 (in Chinese with English abstract).

  • Rival, A., Jaligot, E., Beul้, T., and Finnegan, E.J. (2008). Isolation and expression analysis of genes encoding MET, CMT, and DRM methyltransferases in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) in relation to the ‘mantled’ somaclonal variation. J. Experim. Bot. 59(12), 3271–3281. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern178.

  • Saze, H., Scheid, O.M., and Paszkowski, J. (2003). Maintenance of CpG methylation is essential for epigenetic inheritance during plant gametogenesis. Nature Genetics 34(1), 65–69. https://doi.org/110.1038/ng1138.

  • Sun, Q., Qiao, J., Zhang, S., et al. (2018). Changes in DNA methylation assessed by genomic bisulfite sequencing suggest a role for DNA methylation in cotton fruiting branch development. Peer J. 14(6), e4945. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4945.

  • Tang, K., Lang, Z., Zhang, H., et al. (2016). The DNA demethylase ROS1 targets genomic regions with distinct chromatin modifications. Nature Plants 2(11), 16169. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.169.

  • Wang, B.R., Li, W.G., and Wang, J.B. (2005). Genetic diversity of Alternanthera philoxeroides in China. Aquat. Bot. 81(3), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2005.01.004.

  • Wang, H.B., Qi, X.Y., Chen, S.M., et al. (2015). Limited DNA methylation variation and the transcription of MET1 and DDM1 in the genus Chrysanthemum (Asteraceae): following the track of polyploidy. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 668. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00668.

  • Wang, Z.C., Nie, L.J., and He, Y.X. (2009). The effect of 5-azacytidine to the DNA methylation and morphogenesis character of chrysanthemum during in vitro growth. Acta Hortic. Sinica 36(12), 1783–1790 (in Chinese with English abstract).

  • Xu, J.D., Xu, H.D., Xu, Q., et al. (2015). Characterization of DNA methylation variations during fruit development and ripening of Sweet Orange. Plant Molec. Biol. Rep. 33(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-014-0732-2.

  • Yan, M., Wang, X., Deng, J., et al. (2016). DNA methylation and cerebellar development, the regulation of Notch and Shh pathway. Italian J. Zoology 83(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250003.2015.1126651.

  • Yeang, H.Y. (2013). Solar rhythm in the regulation of photoperiodic flowering of long-day and short-day plants. J. Experim. Bot. 64(10), 2643–2652. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert130.

Received: 28 May 2020 | Accepted: 14 October 2020 | Published: 3 May 2021 | Available online: 3 May 2021

previous article     Volume 86 issue 2     next article