an article



ISHS Contact


  Fruits 72 (5) 306-316 | DOI: 10.17660/th2017/72.5.6
ISSN 0248-1294 print and 1625-967X online | © ISHS 2017 | Fruits, The International Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Horticulture | Original article

Pilot assessment of locally acknowledged morphotypes of Irvingia gabonensis (Aubry-Lecomte) Baill. in southwestern Benin (West Africa)

E.A. Padonou1,2, F.C. Tovissodé3, R. Idohou3,a , V.K. Salako3, L. Fantondji4, R. Vihotogbé1,2,3, B. Fandohan1,2,3 and A.E. Assogbadjo2
1 Ecole de Foresterie et Ingénierie du Bois, Université Nationale d’Agriculture, Benin
2 Laboratoire d’Ecologie Appliquée, Faculté des Sciences Agronomiques, Université d’Abomey-Calavi, 01 BP 526, Cotonou, Benin
3 Laboratoire de Biomathématiques et d’Estimations Forestières, Faculté des Sciences Agronomiques, Université d’Abomey-Calavi, 04 BP 1525, Cotonou, Bénin
4 Direction Générale des Forêts et Ressources Naturelles, BP 393, Cotonou, Benin

Introduction – This study was set up to assess the local perception on morphological differentiation within sweet African bush mango tree (Irvingia gabonensis) in southwestern Benin. Materials and methods – Locally acknowledged morphotypes (LAM) and local differentiation criteria were determined, using group discussions with 60 farmers. A total of 120 trees distributed between the fixed LAM were randomly sampled with farmers’ aid. The trees were morphologically characterized based on their leaves (length and width), fruit (length, diameter and mass), seeds (length, diameter and mass), kernels (mass) and fruit flesh (mass and depth). The owners of the 120 trees were questioned for their LAM preference, number of owned LAM trees, propagation methods, and taboos. Data were analyzed through a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Results and discussion – Three LAM were differentiated: (1) a pasty morphotype named ‘woto’, (2) an aqueous morphotype named ‘shito’, and (3) an intermediate morphotype. The MANOVA revealed that contrary to farmers’ perceptions, the accurate prediction of LAM on the field was hard (P›0.05). However, canonical discriminant analysis indicated an overall significant morphological difference between the three LAM (P‹0.001). Although farmers preferred pasty and intermediate LAM, the aqueous LAM was most abundantly found on farms. Twelve taboos and their potential negative impacts were unanimously recognized in the context of I. gabonensis management. Most farmers admitted to have already broken these taboos, particularly the taboo prohibiting plantation of the species. Conclusion – This study highlights an ongoing but stagnating local domestication process for this species. A progressive breaking of non-profitable taboos appears to be a gate for a guided selection process.

Evaluation pilote des morphotypes localement reconnus de Irvingia gabonensis (Aubry-Lecomte) Baill. dans le Sud-Ouest du Bénin (Afrique de l’Ouest).
Introduction – Cette étude a permis d’évaluer la perception locale de la différenciation morphologique du pommier sauvage (Irvingia gabonensis) dans le sud-ouest du Bénin. Matériel et méthodes – Les morphotypes localement reconnus (MLR) et les critères locaux de différenciation ont été déterminés à partir de discussions de groupe avec 60 agriculteurs. Au total, 120 arbres répartis entre MLR ont été échantillonnés au hasard avec l’appui des agriculteurs. Les arbres ont été caractérisés morphologiquement en fonction de leurs feuille (longueur et largeur), fruit (longueur, diamètre et masse), graine (longueur, diamètre et masse), du noyau (masse) et de la chair du fruit (masse et profondeur). Les propriétaires de 120 arbres ont été interrogés sur leur préférence en MLR, le nombre d’arbres à MLR leur appartenant, leurs méthodes de propagation et les tabous. Les données ont été analysées par analyse de variance multivariée (MANOVA). Résultats et discussion – Trois MLR ont été différenciés: (1) un morphotype pâteux appelé ‘woto’, (2) un morphotype aqueux appelé ‘shito’, et (3) un morphotype intermédiaire. Contrairement aux perceptions des agriculteurs, l’identification précise des MLR sur le terrain s’est révélée difficile (P›0,05). Cependant, l’analyse canonique discriminatoire a fait apparaître une différence morphologique globalement significative entre les trois MLR (P‹0,001). Bien que les agriculteurs préfèrent le MLR pâteux et intermédiaire, le MLR aqueux est le plus abondant. Douze tabous et leurs impacts négatifs potentiels ont été unanimement reconnus dans le contexte de la gestion de I. gabonensis. La plupart des agriculteurs ont admis avoir déjà brisé ces tabous, en particulier le tabou interdisant la plantation de l’espèce. Conclusion – Cette étude fait ressortir le processus de domestication en cours mais stagnant du pommier sauvage. Une rupture progressive des tabous non rentables semble être une porte ouverte sur un processus de sélection assisté.

Keywords Benin, African bush mango tree, Irvingia gabonensis, agroforestry system, plant domestication, local perception

Mots clés Bénin, manguier ou pommier sauvage, Irvingia gabonensis, système agroforestier, domestication des plantes, perception locale

Significance of this study

What is already known on this subject?

  • Several scholars investigated the traditional knowledge, distribution range and ecological adaptation of Irvingia gabonensis.
What are the new findings?
  • The study highlights an ongoing local domestication process of I. gabonensis in southwestern Benin. The fruit characteristics clearly distinguish three locally acknowledged morphotypes of the species. Farmers break the non-profitable taboos for effective domestication of the species.
What is the expected impact on horticulture?
  • Our findings contribute to understand the domestication process of indigenous fruit species.

Download fulltext version How to cite this article       Export citation to RIS format      



  • Adomou, A., Sinsin, B., and Van der Maesen, L. (2006). Phytosociological and chorological approaches to phytogeography: a meso-scale study in Benin. Syst. Geogr. Plants 76, 155–178.

  • Afrique Conseil (2006a). Monographie d’Aplahoué.

  • Afrique Conseil (2006b). Monographie de Klouékanme.

  • Afrique Conseil (2006c) Monographie de Lalo.

  • Afrique Conseil (2006d) Monographie de Toviklin.

  • Ainge, L., and Brown, N. (2004). Bush mango (Irvingia gabonensis and I. wombolu). The Key Non-Timber Forest Products of Central Africa: State of the Knowledge, p. 15.

  • Akoegninou, A. (1984). Contribution à l'étude Botanique des Îlots de Forêts Denses Humides Semi-Décidues en République Populaire du Bénin.

  • Atangana, A.R., Ukafor, V., Anegbeh, P., Asaah, E., Tchoundjeu, Z., Leakey, R.R.B., Fondoun, J.-M., and Ndoumbe, M. (2002). Domestication of Irvingia gabonensis: 2. The selection of multiple traits for potential cultivars from Cameroon and Nigeria. Agroforest Syst. 55, 221–229.

  • Ayuk, E.T., Duguma, B., Franzel, S., Kengue, J., Mollet, M., Tiki-Manga, T., and Zenkeng, P. (1999). Uses, management and economic potential of Irvingia gabonensis in the humid lowlands of Cameroon. Forest Ecol. Manag. 113, 1–9.

  • Brown, L.E., Milner, A.M., and Hannah, D.M. (2010). Predicting river ecosystem response to glacial meltwater dynamics: a case study of quantitative water sourcing and glaciality index approaches. Aquatic Sci. 72, 325–334.

  • Cornelissen, J.H.C., Lavorel, S., Garnie, E., Diaz, S., Buchmann, N., Gurvich, D.E., Reich, P.B., Steege, H., Morgan, H.D., Van der Heijden, M.G.A., Pausas, J.G., and Poorter, H. (2003). A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Austral. J. of Botany 51, 335–380.

  • Fairhead, J., and Leach, M. (1998). Réexamen de l'étendue de la déforestation en Afrique de l'Ouest au XXème siècle. Unasylva 49.

  • Franzel, S., Jaenicke, H., and Janssen, W. (1996). Choosing the right trees – Setting priorities for multipurpose tree improvement (The Hague, The Netherlands: ISNAR [Pub.]), Research Report N°. 8, 80 pp.

  • Futuyma, D.J. (1983). Science on Trial: The Case for Evolution (New York: Pantheon Books), 251 pp.

  • Harris, D., Breese, W.A., and Rao, J. (2005). The improvement of crop yield in marginal environments using ‘on-farm’ seed priming: nodulation, nitrogen fixation, and disease resistance. Austr. J. Agr. Res. 56, 1211–1218.

  • Jenik, J. (1994). The Dahomey Gap: an important issue in African phytogeography. Mém. Soc. Biogeogr. 4, 125–133.

  • Kengni, E., Kengue, J., Ebenezer, E.B.K., and Tabuna, H. (2011). Irvingiagabonensis, Irvingiawombolu, Bush Mango. Conservation and Sustainable Use of Genetic Resources of Priority Food Tree Species in Sub-Saharan Africa (Rome: Bioversity International).

  • Leakey, R.R.B. (1998). Agroforestry in the humid lowlands of West Africa: some reflections on future directions for research. Agroforest. Syst. 40, 253–262.

  • Leakey, R.R. (2001). Win-win landuse strategies for Africa: 1. Building on experience with agroforests in Asia and Latin America. Int. For. Rev., pp. 1–10.

  • Leakey, R.R. (2010). Should we be growing more trees on farms to enhance the sustainability of agriculture and increase resilience to climate change? (Bethesda: ISTF News).

  • Leakey, R.R.B. (2012). Non-timber forest products – A misnomer? J. Trop. For. Sci. 24, 145–146.

  • Leakey, R., Fondoun, J.M., Atangana, A., and Tchoundjeu, Z. (2000). Methodology development for the characterization of genetic traits in the fruits of Irvingia gabonensis: the identification of quantitative criteria. Agroforest. Syst. 50, 47–58.

  • Leakey, R.R.B., and Tchoundjeu, Z. (2001). Diversification of tree crops: Domestication of companion crops for poverty reduction and environmental services. Exp. Agr. 37, 279–296.

  • Leakey, R., Schreckenberg, K., and Tchoundjeu, Z. (2003). The participatory domestication of West African indigenous fruits. Int. For. Rev. 5, 338–347.

  • Leakey, R.R.B., Tchoundjeu, Z., Smith, R.I., Munro, R.C., Fondoun, J.M., Kengue, J., Anegbeh, P.O., Atangana, A.R., Waruhiu, A.N., Asaah, E., Usoro, C., and Ukafor, V. (2004). Evidence that subsistence farmers have domesticated indigenous fruits (Dacryodes edulis and Irvingia gabonensis) in Cameroon and Nigeria. Agroforest. Syst. 60, 101–111.

  • Leakey, R., Pate, K., and Lombard, C. (2005). Domestication potential of Marula (Sclerocarya birrea subsp. caffra) in South Africa and Namibia: 2. Phenotypic variation in nut and kernel traits. Agroforest. Syst. 64, 37–49.

  • Leakey, R., and Page, T. (2006). The ‘ideotype’ concept and its application to the selection of cultivars of trees providing agroforestry tree products. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 16, 5–16.

  • Lowe, A., Lowe, A.J., Gillies, A.C.M., Wilson, J., and Dawson, I.K. (2000). Conservation genetics of bush mango from central/west Africa: implications from random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Mol. Ecol. 9, 831–841.

  • Luckwill, L.C. (1959). Factors controlling the growth and form of fruits. J. Linnean Soc. London, Botany 56294–56302.

  • Maley, J. (1996). The African rain forest – main characteristics of changes in vegetation and climate from the Upper Cretaceous to the Quaternary. Proc. Royal Soc. of Edinburgh. Section B. Biol, Sci. 104, 31–73.

  • Oyediran, I.O., Higdon, M.L., Clark, T.L., and Hibbard, B.E. (2007). Interactions of alternate hosts, postemergence grass control, and rootworm-resistant transgenic corn on western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) damage and adult emergence. J. Econ. Entomol. 100, 557–565.

  • Page, T. (2003). The domestication and improvement of Kunzea pomifera (F. Muell.), Muntries. (Melbourne: University of Melbourne, Burnely College, Institute of Land Food Resources).

  • Pauku, R.L., Lowe, A.J., and Leakey, R.R. (2010). Domestication of indigenous fruit and nut trees for agroforestry in the Solomon Islands. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 19(3), 269–287.

  • R Development Core Team (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (Vienna, Austria). ISBN 3-900051-07-0.

  • Rashidi, M., and Seyfi, K. (2007). Classification of fruit shape in cantaloupe using the analysis of geometrical attributes. World J. Agr. Sci. 3, 735–740.

  • Simons, A.J., and Leakey, R.R.B. (2004). Tree domestication in tropical agroforestry. Agroforest. Syst. 61(2), 167–181.

  • Sowunmi, M.A. (2004). Aspects of Nigerian coastal vegetation in the Holocene: some recent insights. In Past Climate Variability through Europe and Africa (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer [Pub.]), 638 pp.

  • Tchoundjeu, Z., Kengue, J., and Leakey, R. (2002). Domestication of Dacryodes edulis: State-of-the-art. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 12, 3–13.

  • Vihotogbé, C., Houessou, G., Ponette, Q., Le Boulengé, E., and Vihotogbé, R. (2007). Ethnobotany and endogenous conservation of Irvingia gabonensis (Aubry-Lecomte) Baill. in traditional agroforestry systems in Benin. Indilinga: Afr. J. Indigenous Knowl. Syst. 6, 196–209.

  • Vihotogbé, R., Glèlè Kakaï, R., Bongers, F., Van Andel, T., Van den Berg, R.G., Sinsin, B., and Sosef, M.S. (2012). Backgrounds of the domestication process of African bush mango trees (Irvingiaceae) in the Dahomey Gap (West Africa). In Characterization of African Bush Mango Trees with Emphasis on the Differences between Sweet and Bitter Trees in the Dahomey Gap (West Africa). (Ph.D. Thesis) (Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen University), p. 43–82. ISBN 978-94-6173-412-9.

  • Vihotogbé, R., Van den Berg, R.G., and Sosef, M.S. (2013). Morphological characterization of African bush mango trees (Irvingia species) in West Africa. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 60, 1597–1614.

  • Vihotogbé, R., Kakaï, R.G., Bongers, F., Van Andel, T., Van den Berg, R.G., Sinsin, B., and Sosef, M.S. (2014). Impacts of the diversity of traditional uses and potential economic value on food tree species conservation status: Case study of African bush mango trees (Irvingiaceae) in the Dahomey Gap (West Africa). Plant Ecol. Evol. 147, 109–125.

  • Vodouhê, G. (2003). Socio-economic study of bush mango tree (Irvingia gabonensis) in traditional agroforestry system in Benin: Case of Plateau department. Engin. Thesis, Cotonou, Benin.

Received: 8 February 2017 | Accepted: 24 August 2017 | Published: 28 September 2017 | Available online: 28 September 2017

previous article     Volume 72 issue 5     next article