ISHS
  eJHS
     
EJHS
Home


Submit
an article


Subscriptions

ISHS Home

ISHS Contact

Search

eJHS
  Eur.J.Hortic.Sci. 85 (5) 339-343 | DOI: 10.17660/eJHS.2020/85.5.5
ISSN 1611-4426 print and 1611-4434 online | © ISHS 2020 | European Journal of Horticultural Science | Original article

Spectral manipulations to elicit desired quality attributes of herbaceous specialty crops

N. Kelly and E.S. Runkle
Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

SUMMARY
Light-emitting diode (LED) technology has greatly advanced the practicality of growing high-value specialty crops in an indoor environment. Different lighting spectra can affect plant quality attributes of leafy greens (e.g., lettuce) such as leaf shape, texture, taste, coloration, and nutritional compounds. For instance, UV-A (315–400 nm) and blue (B; 400–500 nm) radiation can be used to increase anthocyanin concentrations, which are red-colored pigments that can accumulate in leaf tissue. Anthocyanins are part of a larger group of molecules (phenolics) that have nutritional value but can come at the expense of taste. For example, sensory studies of lettuce have demonstrated that plants with higher phenolic concentrations often have a more bitter taste and are therefore less appealing to consumers. Adding far-red (FR; 700–800 nm) radiation to a spectrum can increase leaf area and yield of lettuce but also decrease leaf coloration, thickness, and desired chemical concentrations. The quality characteristics desired for ornamental seedlings are somewhat different and can include compact growth and early or late flowering. Seedlings are highly responsive to the red (R; 600–700 nm) to FR ratio as well as photon flux density of B radiation. These can be manipulated to inhibit or promote extension growth and flowering. For example, decreasing the R:FR can accelerate flowering in some long-day plants, but not affect flowering in other cultivars and/or species. There are often trade-offs between some quality attributes and plant growth, which must be carefully considered when choosing an indoor lighting spectrum. Here, we summarize research-based findings as they relate to the effects of spectral manipulations on plant quality attributes.

Keywords floriculture transplants, indoor farming, leafy greens, light-emitting diodes, light quality, photomorphogenesis, pigmentation

Significance of this study

What is already known on this subject?

  • This paper outlines what is known about the effects of the radiation spectrum on plant quality attributes when crops are grown indoors under sole-source lighting. It discusses how radiation wavebands can be manipulated to elicit certain desirable traits that are important for both growers and consumers.
What are the new findings?
  • This paper does not present any new research, but instead provides a synthesis of relevant research on the effects of radiation quality on high-value specialty crops such as leafy greens and herbaceous ornamental crops. Furthermore, this paper provides information on how radiation wavebands interact to affect multiple plant quality attributes.
What is the expected impact on horticulture?
  • The objective of this paper is to inform researchers and lighting professionals of recent advances in the area of plant quality manipulations through changes in the indoor lighting environment. It also provides indoor farmers with an easily digestible compilation of research about how the lighting environment regulates plant growth and quality attributes.

Download fulltext version How to cite this article       Export citation to RIS format      

References

  • Allende, A., and Artιs, F. (2003). UV-C radiation as a novel technique for keeping quality of fresh processed ‘Lollo Rosso’ lettuce. Food Res. Intl. 36, 739–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(03)00054-1.

  • Bian, Z.-H., Cheng, R.-F., Yang, Q.-C., Wang, J., and Lu, C. (2016). Continuous light from red, blue, and green light-emitting diodes reduces nitrate content and enhances phytochemical concentrations and antioxidant capacity in lettuce. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 141, 186–195. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.141.2.186.

  • Butelli, E., Titta, L., Giorgio, M., Mock, H.-P., Matros, A., Peterek, S., Schijlen, E.G.W.M., Hall, R.D., Bovy, A.G., Luo, J., and Martin, C. (2008). Enrichment of tomato fruit with health-promoting anthocyanins by expression of select transcription factors. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1301–1308. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1506.

  • Chalker-Scott, L. (1999). Environmental significance of anthocyanins in plant stress responses. Photochem. Photobiol. 70, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1999.tb01944.x.

  • Charles, F., Nilprapruck, P., Roux, D., and Sallanon, H. (2018). Visible light as a new tool to maintain fresh-cut lettuce post-harvest quality. Postharv. Biol. Technol. 135, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.08.024.

  • Eskins, K., Warner, K., and Felker, F.C. (1996). Light quality during early seedling development influences the morphology and bitter taste intensity of mature lettuce. (Lactuca sativa) leaves. J. Plant Physiol. 147, 709–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81482-3.

  • Kerckhoffs, L.H.J., Kendrick, R.E., Whitelam, G.C., and Smith, H. (1992). Extension growth and anthocyanin responses of photomorphogenic tomato mutants to changes in the phytochrome: photoequilibrium during the daily photoperiod. Photochem. Photobiol. 56, 611–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1992.tb02210.x.

  • Kim, H.-H., Goins, G.D., Wheeler, R.M., and Sager, J.C. (2004). Green-light supplementation for enhanced lettuce growth under red-and blue-light-emitting diodes. HortScience 39, 1617–1622. https://doi.org/10.2127/hortsci.39.7.16.17.x.

  • Klein, R.M. (1992). Effects of green light on biological systems. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 67, 199–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1992.tb01019.x.

  • Kozai, T., and Niu, G. (2016). Plant factory as a resource-efficient closed plant production system. In Plant Factory: An Indoor Vertical Farming System for Efficient Quality Food Production, T. Kozai, G. Niu, and M. Takagaki, eds. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier), p. 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801775-3.00004-4.

  • Lee, J.G., Oh, S.S., Cha, S.H., Jang, Y.A., et al. (2010). Effects of red/blue light ratio and short-term light quality conversion on growth and anthocyanin contents of baby leaf lettuce. J. Bio-Environm. Control 19, 351–359. https://doi.org/10.5322/jesi.2914.23.9.1573.

  • Lefsrud, M.G., Kopsell, D.A., and Sams, C.E. (2008). Irradiance from distinct wavelength light-emitting diodes affect secondary metabolites in kale. HortScience 43, 2243–2244. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.43.7.2243.

  • Li, Q., and Kubota, C. (2009). Effects of supplemental light quality on growth and phytochemicals of baby leaf lettuce. Environm. Exp. Bot. 67, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.06.011.

  • Lin, D., Xiao, M., Zhao, J., Li, Z., Xing, B., Li, X., Kong, M., Li, L., Zhang, Q., Chen, S., et al. (2016). An overview of plant phenolic compounds and their importance in human nutrition and management of type 2 diabetes. Molecules 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21101374.

  • Lin, K.-H., Huang, M.-Y., Huang, W.-D., Hsu, M.-H., Yang, Z.-W., and Yang, C.-M. (2013). The effects of red, blue, and white light-emitting diodes on the growth, development, and edible quality of hydroponically grown lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata). Sci. Hortic. 150, 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.10.002.

  • Lotkowska, M.E., Tohge, T., Fernie, A.R., Xue, G.-P., Balazadeh, S., and Mueller-Roeber, B. (2015). The Arabidopsis transcription factor MYB112 promotes anthocyanin formation during salinity and under high light stress. Plant Physiol. 169, 1862–1880. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00605.

  • Massa, G.D., Kim, H.H., Wheeler, R.M., and Mitchell, C.A. (2008). Plant productivity in response to LED lighting. HortScience 43, 1951–1956. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701411714.

  • Meng, Q., and Runkle, E.S. (2019). Far-red radiation interacts with relative and absolute blue and red photon flux densities to regulate growth, morphology, and pigmentation of lettuce and basil seedlings. Sci. Hortic. 255, 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.05.030.

  • Meng, Q., Kelly, N., and Runkle, E.S. (2019). Substituting green or far-red radiation for blue radiation induces shade avoidance and promotes growth in lettuce and kale. Environm. Exp. Bot. 162, 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.03.016.

  • Mitchell, C.A., Dzakovich, M.P., Gomez, C., Lopez, R., Burr, J.F., Hernαndez, R., and Both, A.J. (2015). Light-emitting diodes in horticulture. Hortic. Rev. 43, 1–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119107781.ch01.

  • Morrow, R.C. (2008). LED lighting in horticulture. HortScience 43, 1947–1950. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.43.7.1947.

  • Nicole, C.C.S., Mooren, J., Pereira Terra, A.T., Larsen, D.H., Woltering, E.J., Marcelis, L.F.M., Verdonk, J., Schouten, R., and Troost, F. (2019). Effects of LED lighting recipes on postharvest quality of leafy vegetables grown in a vertical farm. Acta Hortic. 1256, 481–488. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1256.68.

  • Olle, M., and Viršilė, A. (2013). The effects of light-emitting diode lighting on greenhouse plant growth and quality. Agric. Food Sci. 22, 223–234. https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.7897.

  • Park, Y., and Runkle, E.S. (2017). Far-red radiation promotes growth of seedlings by increasing leaf expansion and whole-plant net assimilation. Environm. Exp. Bot. 136, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.12.013.

  • Park, Y., and Runkle, E.S. (2018a). Investigating the interaction between photosynthetic photon flux density and far-red radiation in petunia seedlings under sole-source lighting. Acta Hortic. 1227, 541–548. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1227.68.

  • Park, Y., and Runkle, E.S. (2018b). Far-red radiation and photosynthetic photon flux density independently regulate seedling growth but interactively regulate flowering. Environm. Exp. Bot. 155, 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.06.033.

  • Park, Y., and Runkle, E.S. (2018c). Spectral effects of light-emitting diodes on plant growth, visual color quality, and photosynthetic photon efficacy: white versus blue plus red radiation PLoS ONE 13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202386.

  • Park, Y., and Runkle, E.S. (2019). Blue radiation attenuates the effects of the red to far-red ratio on extension growth but not on flowering. Environm. Exp. Bot. 168, 103871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.103871.

  • Pattison, P.M., Hansen, M., and Tsao, J.Y. (2018). LED lighting efficacy: status and directions. Comptes Rendus Physique 19, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2017.10.013.

  • Qian, H., Liu, T., Deng, M., Miao, H., Cai, C., Shen, W., and Wang, Q. (2016). Effects of light quality on main health-promoting compounds and antioxidant capacity of Chinese kale sprouts. Food Chem. 196, 1232–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.10.055.

  • Son, K.-H., and Oh, M.-M. (2013). Leaf shape, growth, and antioxidant phenolic compounds of two lettuce cultivars grown under various combinations of blue and red light-emitting diodes. HortScience 48, 988–995. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.48.8.988.

  • Song, P., Wu, L., and Guan, W. (2015). Dietary nitrates, nitrites, and nitrosamines intake and the risk of gastric cancer: A meta-analysis. Nutrients 7, 9872–9895. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7125505.

  • Steyn, W.J., Wand, S.J.E., Holcroft, D.M., and Jacobs, G. (2002). Anthocyanins in vegetative tissues: A proposed unified function in photoprotection. New Phytol. 155, 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00482.x.

  • Stutte, G., Edney, S., and Skerritt, T. (2009). Photoregulation of bioprotectant content of red leaf lettuce with light-emitting diodes. HortScience 44, 79–82. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.44.1.79.

  • Sun, J., Nishio, J.N., and Vogelmann, T.C. (1998). Green light drives CO2 fixation deep within leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 39, 1020–1026. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029298.

  • Tong, Y., Yang, Q., and Shimamura, S. (2014). Analysis of electric-energy utilization efficiency in a plant factory with artificial light for lettuce production. Acta Hortic. 1037, 277–284. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1037.32.

  • Viršile, A., Brazaityte, A., Sakalauskiene, S., Jankauskiene, J., Miliauskiene, J., and Vaštakaite, V. (2018). LED lighting for reduced nitrate contents in green vegetables. Acta Hortic. 1227, 669–675. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1227.85.

  • Wang, Y., Zhou, B., Sun, M., Li, Y., and Kawabata, S. (2012). UV-A light induces anthocyanin biosynthesis in a manner distinct from synergistic blue + UV-B light and UV-A/blue light responses in different parts of the hypocotyls in turnip seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol. 53, 1470–1480. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcs088.

  • Zhan, L., Li, Y., Hu, J., Pang, L., and Fan, H. (2012). Browning inhibition and quality preservation of fresh-cut romaine lettuce exposed to high intensity light. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 14, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2012.02.004.

Received: 31 October 2019 | Accepted: 6 April 2020 | Published: 21 October 2020 | Available online: 21 October 2020

previous article     Volume 85 issue 5     next article