ISHS
  eJHS
     
EJHS
Home


Submit
an article


Subscriptions

ISHS Home

ISHS Contact

Search

eJHS
  Eur.J.Hortic.Sci. 81 (5) 237-242 | DOI: 10.17660/eJHS.2016/81.5.1
ISSN 1611-4426 print and 1611-4434 online | © ISHS 2016 | European Journal of Horticultural Science | Original article

Photosynthesis in horticultural plants in relation to light quality and CO2 concentration

K.-J. Bergstrand1, A. Suthaparan2, L.M. Mortensen2 and H.R. Gislerød2
1Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden
2Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway

SUMMARY
Background: The use of light emitting diode (LED) technology within plant lighting applications provides possibilities for designing specific spectra for different purposes. In order to maximise the use of light, it has been suggested that the light spectrum should be composed with respect to the photosynthetic response of the green plant. In greenhouse applications, artificial light is often used in combination with CO2 injection to increase the concentration of CO2 in the greenhouse air to 600–900 μmol mol-1. Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine interactions between light quality and CO2 concentration with respect to photosynthesis in horticultural plants. Methods: Experiments using leaf-chamber photosynthesis measurements were performed in order to examine plant responses to different wavelengths in relation to CO2 concentration. Three different plant species were used in the experiments; Solanum lycopersicum (tomato), Cucumis sativus (cucumber) and Euphorbia pulcherrima (poinsettia). Photosynthesis was measured using four different narrow-band light qualities; 450 nm (blue), 530 nm (green), 620 nm (orange) and 660 nm (red). In addition, four different CO2 concentrations were used for measurements; 400, 600, 800 and 1,000 μmol mol-1. Results: The results revealed a clear difference in photosynthetic response to the four different wavelengths used, with the highest carbon assimilation obtained when the plants were subjected to 620 nm light, followed by 660, 530 and 450 nm. However, there was no interaction between light quality and CO2 concentration. Conclusions: In tomato and poinsettia, but not in cucumber, a multi-wavelength spectrum also containing green wavelengths results in higher photosynthetic activity than a narrow-band spectrum composed solely of blue and red wavelengths. However, increasing the CO2 concentration has a much larger effect than changing the spectral distribution, emphasising the importance of good control of CO2 concentration in the greenhouse.

Keywords Cucumis sativus, Euphorbia pulcherrima, light emitting diode, photosynthesis measurements, Solanum lycopersicum

Significance of this study

What is already known on this subject?

  • It is already known that light quality and CO2 concentration individually affect photosynthesis in green plants.
What are the new findings?
  • This study demonstrates that a combined spectrum gives higher photosynthesis than red-blue light, but that there is no interaction between light quality and CO2 concentration regarding photosynthesis.
What is the expected impact on horticulture?
  • Light fixtures designed for horticultural purposes should provide a combined spectrum and that accurate control of CO2 concentration to >800 μmol mol-1 is important.

Download fulltext version How to cite this article       Export citation to RIS format      

E-mail: Karl-Johan.Bergstrand@slu.se  

References

  • Bergstrand, K.-J., Mortensen, L.M., Suthaparan, A., and Gislerød, H.R. (2016). Acclimatisation of greenhouse crops to differing light quality. Sci. Hortic. 204, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.03.035.

  • Bergstrand, K.-J., Asp, H., and Schüssler, H.K. (2015). Utnyttja belysningen effektivt. LTV-fakultetens faktablad 2015.

  • Bergstrand, K.-J., and Schüssler, H.K. (2013). Growth, Development and Photosynthesis of some Horticultural Plants as Affected by Different Supplementary Lighting Technologies. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 78, 119–125.

  • Dueck, T., Janse, J., Eveleens, B., Kempkes, F., and Marcelis, L. (2011). Growth of tomatoes under hybrid LED and HPS lighting. Acta Hortic. 952, 335–342.

  • Folta, K.M., and Childers, K.S. (2008). Light as a Growth Regulator: Controlling Plant Biology with Narrow-bandwidth Solid-state Lighting Systems. HortScience 43, 1957–1964.

  • Hemming, S. (2011). Use of natural and artificial light in horticulture-interaction of plant and technology. Acta Hortic. 907, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.907.1.

  • Kim, H.-H., Goins, G.D., Wheeler, R.M., and Sager, J.C. (2004). Green-light supplementation for enhanced lettuce growth under red- and blue-light-emitting diodes. HortScience 39, 1617–1622.

  • Lin, K.-H., Huang, M.-Y., Huang, W.-D., Hsu, M.-H., Yang, Z.-W., and Yang, C.-M. (2013). The effects of red, blue, and white light-emitting diodes on the growth, development, and edible quality of hydroponically grown lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata). Sci. Hortic. 150, 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.10.002.

  • McCree, K.J. (1972). The action spectrum, absorptance and quantum yield of photosynthesis in crop plants. Agric. Meteorol. 9, 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-1571(71)90022-7.

  • Morrow, R.C. (2008). LED Lighting in Horticulture. HortScience 43:1947–1950.

  • Mortensen, L.M. (1987). Review: CO2 enrichment in greenhouses. Crop responses. Sci. Hortic. 33, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(87)90028-8.

  • Nelson, J.A., and Bugbee, B. (2014). Economic analysis of greenhouse lighting: Light emitting diodes vs. high intensity discharge fixtures. PloS one 9(6) e99010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099010.

  • Paradiso, R., Meinen, E., Snel, J.F., De Visser, P., Van Ieperen, W., Hogewoning, S.W., and Marcelis, L.F. (2011). Spectral dependence of photosynthesis and light absorptance in single leaves and canopy in rose. Sci. Hortic. 127, 548–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.11.017.

  • Pinho, P. (2008). Usage and control of solid-state lighting for plant growth. PhD-thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki.

  • Poulet, L., Massa, G., Morrow, R., Bourget, C., Wheeler, R., and Mitchell, C. (2014). Significant reduction in energy for plant-growth lighting in space using targeted LED lighting and spectral manipulation. Life Sci. Space Res. 2, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lssr.2014.06.002.

  • Sharkey, T.D., and Raschke, K. (1981). Effect of light quality on stomatal opening in leaves of Xanthium strumarium L. Plant Physiol. 68, 1170–1174. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.68.5.1170.

  • Sun, J., Nishio, J.N., and Vogelmann, T.C. (1998). Green light drives CO2 fixation deep within leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 39, 1020–1026. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029298.

  • Tallman, G., and Zeiger, E. (1988). Light quality and osmoregulation in Vicia guard cells evidence for involvement of three metabolic pathways. Plant Physiol. 88, 887–895. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.88.3.887.

  • Terashima, I., Fujita, T., Inoue, T., Chow, W.S., and Oguchi, R. (2009). Green light drives leaf photosynthesis more efficiently than red light in strong white light: revisiting the enigmatic question of why leaves are green. Plant Cell Physiol. 50, 684–697. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcp034.

Received: 6 June 2016 | Accepted: 26 July 2016 | Published: 30 October 2016 | Available online: 26 October 2016

previous article     Volume 81 issue 5     next article