Eur.J.Hortic.Sci. 80 (6) 288-295 | DOI: 10.17660/eJHS.2015/80.6.4|
ISSN 1611-4426 print and 1611-4434 online | © ISHS 2015 | European Journal of Horticultural Science | Original article
Physiological responses and quality attributes of Jiashi muskmelon (Cucurbitaceae, Cucumis melo L.) following postharvest hydrogen peroxide treatment during storage
G. Chen1, J. Chen1,2, Z. Feng3, X. Mao1 and D. Guo1
1Food College, Shihezi University, Xinjiang, PR China
2School of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang province, PR China
3College of Food Science and Pharmacy, Xinjiang Agricultural University Urumqi, Xinjiang, PR China
The use of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) as a potential postharvest treatment for Jiashi muskmelon (Cucurbitaceae, Cucumis melo L.) was investigated. Muskmelon fruit were treated with 3, 4 and 5% (v/v) H2O2, placed into shelves, and stored at 6±1°C and 80–90% relative humidity for 60 days. Physiological responses, nutritional attributes and decay rates were evaluated. H2O2 treatment effectively inhibited respiration and ethylene production rates, and delayed the decline of firmness, soluble solid concentration (SSC) and mass loss, and delayed changes in the contents of Vitamin C, titratable acidity, total phenolic substances, i.e., flavonoids and anthocyanin, and reduced postharvest decay in melons during storage. H2O2 treatment also significantly enhanced activities of defense-related enzymes peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL). These results suggested that H2O2 treatment might trigger several defense responses in muskmelon fruit against pathogenic infection and could be a viable alternative to conventional control of postharvest diseases and improvement of storage quality of horticultural products. In view of these promising results, further research is warranted to elucidate the mechanism of improving fruit quality and resistance to melon fruit decay by H2O2.
H2O2 treatment, Jiashi melon, postharvest, physiological attributes, storage quality
Significance of this study
What is already known on this subject?
What are the new findings?
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a well-studied oxidizing agent, directly toxic to pathogens. H2O2 has antimicrobial efficiency. H2O2 is of great use in hydroponics and soilless gardening, is sometimes used for root initiation in cuttings, and has been applied to many plants and fresh fruit.
What is the expected impact on horticulture?
In this article, it was found that H2O2 delayed the climacteric, enhanced defense-related enzymes activities, obviously delaying the decline of firmness and weight loss. H2O2 treatment maintained melon quality attributes, and delayed changes in contents of Vitamin C, TA, total phenolic, flavonoids and anthocyanin, and reduced postharvest natural decay in melons during storage.
H2O2 treatment may contribute to new technology of storage and preservation after harvest and improve fruit quality and resistance to Jiashi melon fruit decay.
Alexandre, E.M.C., Brandão, T.R.S., and Silva, C.L.M. (2012). Assessment of the impact of hydrogen peroxide solutions on microbial loads and quality factors of red bell peppers, strawberries and watercress. Food Control 27, 362–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.04.012.
Aharoni, Y., Copel, A., and Fallik, E. (1994). The use of hydrogen peroxide to control postharvest decay on ‘Galia’ melons. Ann. Appl. Biol. 125(2), 189–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1994.tb04960.x.
Assis, J.S., Maldonado, R., Munoz, T., Escribano, M.I., and Merodio, C. (2001). Effect of high carbon dioxide concentration on PAL activity and phenolic contents in ripening cherimoya fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 23, 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00100-4.
Bassetto, E., Jacomino, A.P., Pinheiro, A.L., and Kluge, R.A. (2005). Delay of ripening of ‘Pedro Sato’ guava with 1-methylcyclopropene. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 35, 303–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.08.003.
Bi, Y., Tian, S.P., Zhao, J., and Ge, Y.H. (2005). Harpin induces local and systemic resistance against Trichothecium roseum in harvested Hami melons. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 38, 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2005.05.012.
Devi, S.R., and Prasad, M.N.V. (1996). Ferulic acid mediated changes in oxidative enzymes of maize seedlings–implication of growth. Biologia Plantarum 38, 387–395.
Eckert, J.W., and Ogawa, J.M. (1998). The chemical control of postharvest diseases: deciduous fruits, berries, vegetables and root/tuber crops. Annu. Rev. of Phytopath. 26(1), 433–469. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.26.090188.002245.
Fallik, E., Aharoni, Y., Grinberg, S., Copel, A., and Klein, J.D. (1994). A postharvest hydrogen peroxide treatment inhibits decay in eggplant and sweet red pepper. Crop Prot. 13(6), 451–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-2194(94)90094-9.
Hu, X.S., Xie, X., and Zhang, Y.T. (1993). A discussion on testing respiratory intensity of fruits with infrared CO2 analyzer. Analysis Apparatus 2, 49–52.
Janisiewicz, W.J., and Korsten, L. (2002). Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits. Ann. Rev. Phyto. 40, 411–441. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.120401.130158.
Mayer, A.M. and Harel, E. (1991). Phenoloxidases and their significance in fruit and vegetables. In Food enzymology, P.F. Fox, ed. (London: Elsevier Science Publishers), 1, 373–398.
Milosevic, N., and Slusarenko, A.J. (1996). Active oxygen metabolism and lignification in the hypersensitive response in bean. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 49, 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmpp.1996.0045.
Ölmez, H., and Kretzschmar, U. (2009). Potential alternative disinfection methods for organic fresh-cut industry for minimizing water consumption and environmental impact. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 42(3), 686–693.
Ozaki, K., Uchida, A., Takabe, T., Shinagawa, F., Tanaka, Y., Takabe, T., Hayashi, T., Hattori, T., Rai, A.K., and Takabe, T. (2009). Enrichment of sugar content in melon fruits by hydrogen peroxide treatment. Plant Physiol. 166, 569–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2008.08.007.
Pirie, A., and Mullins, M.G. (1976). Changes in anthocyanin and phenolic content of grapevine leaf and fruit tissue treated with sucrose, nitrate and abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. 58, 468–472. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.58.4.468.
Sapers, G.M., Miller, R.L., and Cooke, P.H. (1999). Structure and composition of mushrooms as affected by hydrogen peroxide wash. Food Sci. 64(5), 889–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1999.tb15934.x.
Sapers, G.M., and Sites, J.E. (2003). Efficacy of 1% hydrogen peroxide wash in decontaminating apples and cantaloupe melons. Food Sci. 68(5), 1793–1797. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb12331.x.
Tian, S.P. (2000). Effect of ultra-low oxygen treatment on content of volatile compounds in sweet orange fruits during storage. Chin. Bull. Bot. 17, 160–167.
Tian, S.P., Li, B.Q., and Xu, Y. (2005). Effects of O2 and CO2 concentration on physiology and quality of litchi fruit in storage. Food Chem. 91, 659–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.06.038.
Vander, P., Varum, K.M., Domard, A., El-Gueddari, N.E., and Moerschbacher, B.M. (1998). Comparison of the ability of partially N-acetylated chitosans and chitooligosaccharides to elicit resistance reactions in wheat leaves. Plant Physiol. 118, 1353–1359.
Wang, Y.S., Tian, S.P., Xu, Y., Qin, G.Z., and Yao, H.J. (2004). Changes in the activities of pro- and anti-oxidant enzymes in peach fruit inoculated with Cryptococcus laurentii or Penicillium expansum at 0 or 20°C. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 34, 21–28.
Watkins, C., and Harman, J. (1981). Use of penetrometer to measure firmness of fruit. Orch. New Zealand 54(14), 16.
Yair, A., Azica, C., and Elazar, F. (1994). The use of hydrogen peroxide to control postharvest decay on ‘Galia’ melons. The Ann. Appl. Biol. 125(2), 189–193.
Zhu, Z., Zhang, Z.Q., Qin, G.Z., and Tian, S.P. (2010). Effects of brassinosteroids on postharvest disease and senescence of jujube fruit in storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 56, 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.11.014.
Received: 12 August 2014 | Revised: 24 April 2015 | Accepted: 16 October 2015 | Published: 21 December 2015 | Available online: 21 December 2015