ISHS
  eJHS
     
EJHS
Home


Submit
an article


Subscriptions

ISHS Home

ISHS Contact

Search

eJHS
  Eur.J.Hortic.Sci. 80 (4) 149-154 | DOI: 10.17660/eJHS.2015/80.4.1
ISSN 1611-4426 print and 1611-4434 online | © ISHS 2015 | European Journal of Horticultural Science | Original article

Ethylene responses in Hydrangea macrophylla - leaf abscission, flower development and postharvest performance

U.B. Lauridsen, H. Lütken and R. Müller
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark

SUMMARY
Longevity of flowers and overall postharvest performance of plants are the most important quality characteristics in ornamental plants. The omnipresent phytohormone ethylene exerts a central role in both flower development and senescence. Hydrangea is a genus comprising shrubs of high ornamental value and although widely distributed, their tolerance towards ethylene has, besides the use as defoliant prior to cold storage, hardly been investigated. The objective of the current study was to study the effect of ethylene on leaf abscission, flower development and postharvest performance in two commercial Hydrangea cultivars, designated Hm080108 and Hm080109. Ethylene in a concentration of 5 µL L-1 for 7 days served as an effective defoliator in the two investigated Hydrangea cultivars in transition towards dormancy. Hm080108 and Hm080109 dropped 13.5±1.1 and 14.6±1.4 leaves, respectively, in response to this ethylene treatment compared to 5.7±0.5 and 4.6±0.5 leaves, respectively, in the control treatment. Interestingly, defoliation with ethylene had an effect on subsequent flower development; Hm080109 developed significantly more inflorescences compared to non-treated control plants, with 3.3±0.6 and 1.5±0.5 inflorescences per plant, respectively. Vegetative plants of Hm080108 subjected to 2 µL L-1 ethylene responded with a leaf drop of 5.1±0.5 after 12 days of ethylene exposure, i.e., significantly higher than the controls which dropped 1.7±0.5 leaves. Both cultivars subjected to 2 µL L-1 ethylene for three days responded with a significantly higher sepal drop of 18.4±4.4 and 19.5±8.8 for Hm080108 and Hm080109, respectively, compared to no sepal drop in the controls. Collectively, the flower development observed upon defoliation opens up for novel commercial application of ethylene in promoting flowering.

Keywords defoliation, ethylene sensitivity, ornamentals, postharvest quality

Significance of this study

What is already known on this subject?

  • Ethylene can be used as defoliator in Hydrangea.
What are the new findings?
  • Ethylene can promote flowering in Hydrangea. Moreover Hydrangea is more sensitive to ethylene than previously thought.
What is the expected impact on horticulture?
  • Ethylene can contribute to improved defoliation of Hydrangea before cool storage and promote flowering.

Download fulltext version How to cite this article       Export citation to RIS format      

E-mail: hlm@plen.ku.dk  

References

  • Abeles, F.B., Morgan, P.W., and Saltveit, M.E. (1992). Ethylene in plant biology, 2nd ed. (San Diego: Academic Press).
  • Bartholomew, D.P., Paull, R.E., and Rohrbach, K.G. (2002). The pineapple: botany, production, and uses (Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing).
  • Blom, T.J., and Smith, R.B. (1994). Ethylene gas for defoliation of Hydrangeas. HortScience 29, 636–637.
  • Clark, K.L., Larsen, P.B., Wang, X.X., and Chang, C. (1998). Association of the Arabidopsis CTR1 Raf-like kinase with the ETR1 and ERS ethylene receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95, 9060–9060. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.9.5401.
  • Clark, E.M.R., Dole, J.M., Carlson, A.S., Moody, E.P., McCall, I.F., Fanelli, F.L., and Fonteno, W.C. (2010). Vase life of new cut flower cultivars. HortTechnology 20, 1016–1025.
  • Ferrante, A., Trivellini, A., Scuderi, D., Romano, D., and Vernieri, P. (2015). Post-production physiology and handling of ornamental potted plants. Postharvest Biol. Tech. 100, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.09.005.
  • Galopin, G., Codarin, S., Viemont, J.D., and Morel, P. (2008). Architectural Development of Inflorescence in Hydrangea macrophylla cv. Hermann Dienemann. HortScience 43, 361–365.
  • Kofranek, A., and Leiser, A.T. (1958). Chemical defoliation of Hydrangea macrophylla Ser. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 71, 555–562.
  • Lauridsen, U.B., Lütken, H., and Müller, R. (2015). Ethylene responses in three Hydrangea lines. Acta Hortic. 1060, 39–46. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1060.5.
  • Lebeau, F., Imele, J.P., Teisson, C., and Delhove, G. (2009). Efficiency of the Ananas comosus (L.) Merr. flower induction treatment based on ethylene enriched activated carbon (TIFBio). Biotechnologie Agronomie Société et Environnement 13, 395–400.
  • Lütken, H., Clarke, J.L., and Müller, R. (2012). Genetic engineering and sustainable production of ornamentals: Current status and future directions. Plant Cell Rep. 31, 1141–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-012-1265-5.
  • Müller, R., Stummann, B.M., and Serek, M. (2000). Characterization of an ethylene receptor family with differential expression in rose (Rosa hybrida L.) flowers. Plant Cell Rep. 19, 1232–1239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990000251.
  • Müller, R., Andersen, A.S., Serek, M., and Stummann, B.M. (2001a). Physiological and genetic reasons for different postharvest characteristics in miniature potted roses. Acta Hortic. 543, 153–157. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.543.19.
  • Müller, R., Stummann, B.M., and Andersen, A.S. (2001b). Comparison of postharvest properties of closely related miniature rose cultivars (Rosa hybrida L.). Scientia Hort. 91, 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(01)00252-7.
  • Müller, R., and Stummann, B.M. (2005). Genetic control of ethylene biosynthesis, perception and signal transduction related to flower senescence in ornamentals. In Crops: growth, quality and biotechnology, I.R. Dris, ed. (Helsinki, Finland).
  • Serek, M., and Reid, M.S. (2000). Ethylene and postharvest performance of potted kalanchoë. Postharvest Biol. and Technol. 18, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(99)00055-1.
  • Sisler, E.C., Grichko, V., Serek, M., Tholen, D., Poorter, H., Voesenek, L.A.C.J., Ferrante, A., Francini, A., Wang, J., Pan, R., Dreuge, U., Herder, J., Goormachtig, S., Holsters, M., Harrison, M., Nath, P., Trivedi, P.K., Sane, V.A., Sane, A.P., and Khan, N.A. (2006). Ethylene action in plants, N.A. Khan, ed. (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag).
  • Sun, Y.J., Christensen, B., Liu, F.L., Wang, H.Q., and Müller, R. (2009). Effects of ethylene and 1-MCP (1-methylcyclopropene) on bud and flower drop in mini Phalaenopsis cultivars. Plant Growth Regul. 59, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-009-9391-y.
  • Tatsuki, M. (2010). Ethylene Biosynthesis and Perception in Fruit. Journal of the Jpn. Soc. for Hort. Sci. 79, 315–326. https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs1.79.315.
  • Tjia, B., and Buxton, J. (1976). Influence of ethephon spray in defoliation and subsequent growth on Hydrangea macrophylla Thunb. HortScience 11, 2.
  • Turnbull, C.G.N., Sinclair, E.R., Anderson, K.L., Nissen, R.J., Shorty, A.J., and Lanham, T.E. (1999). Routes of ethephon uptake in pineapple (Ananas comosus) and reasons for failure of flower induction. J. Plant Growth Reg. 18, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00007062.
  • Woltering, E.J., and Van Doorn, W.G. (1988). Role of ethylene in senescence of petals – morphological and taxonomical relationships. J. Exp. Bot. 39, 1605–1616. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/39.11.1605.
  • Zhaofen, W., and Bartholomew, B. (2001). Hydrangea Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. Flora of China 8, 411–422.

Received: 26 August 2014 | Revised: 12 June 2015 | Accepted: 23 June 2015 | Published: 24 August 2015 | Available online: 24 August 2015

previous article     Volume 80 issue 4     next article