Eur.J.Hortic.Sci. 80 (2) 51-55 | DOI: 10.17660/eJHS.2015/80.2.1|
ISSN 1611-4426 print and 1611-4434 online | © ISHS 2015 | European Journal of Horticultural Science | Original article
Plant developmental consequences of lighting from above or below in the production of Poinsettia
K.-J. Bergstrand, H. Asp, E.H. Larsson Jönsson and H.K. Schüssler
Department of Biosystems and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden
Artificial light is used for many horticultural crops produced in greenhouses, not least ornamental pot plants. New technologies such as LEDs will possibly replace high intensity discharge lamps as the main technology for lighting in horticulture. However, LEDs are quite different from discharge lamps as regards the handling of waste heat. They have low output of radiant heat, but the waste heat is produced in the fixture and must be cooled away using fans or heat sinks. The low radiant heat will result in lower leaf temperature in the crop, possibly prolonging production time. LED fixtures are often voluminous due to the need for cooling systems, creating large shade effects when installed at the top of the greenhouse. To overcome these issues, this greenhouse study tested placing the light source, in the form of LED bars, under the crop, thus illuminating the abaxial side of the leaves. The results showed that the growth and elongation of the Euphorbia plants was similar irrespective of whether the light was supplied at the abaxial or adaxial side of the leaves. The air temperature within the canopy increased when the light source was placed within the canopy and fresh weight, dry weight and bract length of the bract also increased compared with when the same light was supplied from above, probably due to the higher temperature. Placing LED light sources below the canopy of potted ornamentals was found to be a feasible solution for supplying supplementary light.
artificial lighting, chlorophyll fluorescence, Euphorbia pulcherrima, greenhouse horticulture, light emitting diode, photosynthesis
Significance of this study
What is already known on this subject?
What are the new findings?
Using LEDs for assimilation light is different from using high intensity discharge lamps, as very little infrared heat is emitted from the LEDs. It is also known that increasing the Red:Far red ratio within the canopy will reduce stem elongation.
What is the expected impact on horticulture?
Stem elongation was not affected with respect to the direction of the supplementary light. However, plant fresh- and dry weight was increased if light was given from below, as was the air temperature within the canopy.
LED lighting systems provide possibilities for precision lighting. Placing luminaires inside or below the canopy might be an efficient way of providing light with high precision, and be able to heat the crop inserted of the greenhouse air with the waste heat. Placing fixtures inside canopy also reduces shadow effects.
- Bergstrand, K.-J., and Schüssler, H.K. (2012). Growth and Photosynthesis of Ornamental Plants Cultivated under Different Light Sources. Acta Hort. 956, 141–147. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.956.13.
- Bergstrand, K.-J., and Schüssler, H.K. (2013). Growth, Development and Photosynthesis of some Horticultural Plants as Affected by Different Supplementary Lighting Technologies. Europ. J. Hort. Sci. 78, 119–125.
- Bliznikas, Z., Breive, K., Novickovas, A., Vitta, P., and Zukauskas, A. (2009). Solid-state lamp for the improvement of nutritional quality of leafy vegetables. Electronics and Electrical Engineering 8, 47–50.
- Bourget, C.M. (2008). An Introduction to Light-emitting Diodes. HortScience 43, 1944–1946.
- Bula, R.J., Morrow, R.C., Tibbitts, T.W., Barta, D.J., Ignatius, R.W., and Martin, T.S. (1991). Light-emitting diodes as a radiation source for plants. HortScience 26, 203–205.
- Gómez, C., Morrow, R.C., Bourget, C.M., Massa, G.D., and Mitchell, C.A. (2013). Comparison of Intracanopy Light-emitting Diode Towers and Overhead High-pressure Sodium Lamps for Supplemental Lighting of Greenhouse-grown Tomatoes. HortTechnology 23, 93–98.
- Higashide, T. (2009). Light interception by tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum) grown on a sloped field. Agric. For. Meteorol. 149, 756–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.10.017.
- Hogewoning, S.W., Trouwborst, G., Maljaars, H., Poorter, H., Van Ieperen, W., and Harbinson, J. (2010). Blue light dose-responses of leaf photosynthesis, morphology, and chemical composition of Cucumis sativus grown under different combinations of red and blue light. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 3107–3117. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq132.
- Johnson, G.N., Young, A.J., Scholes, J.D., and Horton, P. (1993). The dissipation of excess excitation energy in British plant species. Plant, Cell and Environment 16, 673–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00485.x.
- Kasperbauer, M.J. (1971). Spectral Distribution of Light in a Tobacco Canopy and Effects of End-of-Day Light Quality on Growth and Development. Plant Physiol. 47, 775–778. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.47.6.775.
- Massa, G.D., Kim, H.-H., Wheeler, R.M., and Mitchell, C.A. (2008). Plant productivity in response to LED lighting. HortScience 43, 1951–1956.
- Morrow, R.C. (2008). LED Lighting in Horticulture. HortScience 43, 1947–1950.
- Moss, D.N. (1964). Optimum lighting of leaves. Crop Sci. 4, 131–136.
- Paradiso, R., and Marcelis, L.F.M. (2012). The Effect of Irradiating Adaxial or Abaxial Side on Photosynthesis of Rose Leaves. Acta Hort. 956, 157–163. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.956.15.
- Sattin, M., Zuin, M.C., and Sartorato, I. (1994). Light quality beneath field-grown maize, soybean and wheat canopiesred: far red variations. Physiol. Plant. 91, 322–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb00439.x.
- Soares, A.S., Driscoll, S.P., Olmos, E., Harbinson, J., Arrabaça, M.C., and Foyer, C.H. (2008). Adaxial/abaxial specification in the regulation of photosynthesis and stomatal opening with respect to light orientation and growth with CO2 enrichment in the C4 species Paspalum dialatatum. New Phytologist 177(1), 186–198.
- Trouwborst, G., Oosterkamp, J., Hogewoning, S.W., Harbinson, J., and Van Ieperen, W. (2010). The responses of light interception, photosynthesis and fruit yield of cucumber to LED-lighting within the canopy. Physiol. Plant. 138, 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01333.x.
- Warren Wilson, J., Hand, D.W., and Hannah, M.A. (1992). Light Interception and Photosynthetic Efficiency in Some Glasshouse Crops. J. Exp. Bot. 43, 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/43.3.363.
Received: 6 June 2014 | Revised: 4 November 2014 | Accepted: 9 December 2014 | Published: 22 April 2015 | Available online: 22 April 2015